Like so many Americans -- especially those of us who have done serious battle with our health care system -- I have eagerly awaited the release of SiCKO. I am happy to report that I loved the movie, but with reservations. I hope that, by addressing my reservations here I, too, will make a difference by bringing these concerns to the attention of those who are working to change our healthcare system.
My reservations have nothing to do with the fact that Moore idealized the universal healthcare systems of England, Canada, France and Cuba. He never said he was making a true documentary. And he never presents both sides equally. That's simply not his modus. I love his films anyway. And I certainly would rather live in a country with universal healthcare -- even with long lines. Heck, let's not kid ourselves: we often have to wait a long time for care in America. That would mean little to me if we were all completely covered medically.
And I really love the fact that Moore, instead of making a film about the horrors of being uninsured in America, took an unexpected turn by exploring the problems suffered by the majority of us who feel (naively) confident because we are insured. If he'd concentrated his film on the uninsured -- as many assumed he would -- most Americans would have distanced themselves emotionally with: "Well, that could never happen to me."
But focusing on the insured -- the majority of us -- and the fact that we are not as safe as we think we are, was brilliant. It puts the fear of God into lots more people.
As well it should.
I wrote a letter to Michael Moore when, in February, 2006, he sent out his request for medical horror stories. In it, I told him how my husband, Tim, also originally from Flint, Michigan, had suffered a cancerous brain tumor in 1990 at the age of 40, and how for the next 15 years until his death in 2005, we battled both our insurance company and the hospitals.
I also told him how sub-standard I thought the care Tim received had been in some of the so-called best hospitals in our country.
I told him that we were insured, with what was supposed to be a "Cadillac" of policies, and that, as Tim's illness progressed, our insurance company kept raising our rates, until we were paying $1700 a month for a policy that left us with thousands and thousands of dollars in uncovered bills.
Just like several of the people featured in Moore's film, from the beginning, our insurance company tried to get out of paying anything for Tim's initial brain tumor surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation and numerous infections. They cited his tumor as a "pre-existing condition."
Why "pre-existing"? Because Tim had had a seizure 5 years earlier, which had been misdiagnosed by our doctor as a "sleep disturbance." Luckily, unlike so many people in Moore's movie, we won that first battle -- but not without the help of many people, and many hours spent by me, as well.
Our woes kept escalating. Like Donna and Larry Smith, the hardworking, 50-something couple in Moore's film, who were forced to move into their daughter's basement storage room because of high deductibles and insurance co-pays, Tim's visits to the hospital and the doctors continued, and our uncovered bills kept mounting. In addition, our $1700 per month "Cadillac" insurance policy only minimally covered the cost of Tim's numerous medications, which totaled several hundred dollars a month.
Although I was still working full-time, we were nearly broke.
But, here is a really important point -- and a point that Moore does NOT address in the movie: Our insurance company was not the only one who was rapacious. The hospitals and doctors, too, demanded their full "pound of flesh." Of course, I'm sure that most of them deserved to be paid, but they had already been paid very handsomely by our insurance company. (And remember, this was NOT an HMO.)
The problem was, in many cases, the hospitals and doctors charged more than the "usual and customary" amounts the insurance company was willing to pay. And although they had already received hundreds of thousands of dollars, both the doctors and the hospitals went after us for every last dime.
When there is a serious illness, many, many doctors are involved, most of whom neither Tim nor I had never seen or heard of, even though I was in his room almost all the time.
The prodigious efforts of these doctors' offices and hospitals to collect the many thousands of dollars remind me of Lee Einer, the insurance company "hitman" featured in SiCKO, who said it was his job to get money back from patients, no matter what he had to do to get it. "We go after this like it's a murder case," he said. Tim and I were down to one income (mine), and even though I was making payments the best I could, these folks called me nearly constantly at work; they sent collection notices; they harassed me. I told all of this to Michael Moore in my letter.
Which brings me to my most serious criticism of SiCKO.
To only attack the insurance and pharmaceutical industries -- and they are both pretty greedy -- is, I believe, a huge mistake. They certainly are not the only healthcare villains.
Moore points out in SiCKO that the AMA was behind the early efforts to block Medicare, because it was "socialized medicine." He pointed out that the AMA arranged coffee klatches, in which doctors' wives conducted an anti-Medicare "Operation Coffee Cup" campaign, aided enormously by a promotional recording by Ronald Reagan -- back when he was "just" an actor. It's priceless: Turn your speakers up and listen to it here! (I am indebted to Doug Hammond's Dirty World News blog for turning this recording up!)
Does Michael Moore think that America's doctors won't try to block all serious plans for universal health care now? Indeed, the AMA has already released its official reaction to the film. Read the statement. It's almost laughable, since it seems obvious that Edward L. Langston, MD, "Chair, American Medical Association," the person credited with having written it, most likely didn't actually see SiCKO, before putting pen to paper. (The AMA obviously thought the film was about those who are without insurance. Check it out.)
Moore humorously looks at the fact that there are more healthcare lobbyists in Washington than Congress people, and that many -- including Hillary Clinton -- are financially indebted to them. But he doesn't touch the fact that our doctors, too, are in the thrall of Big Pharma. All you have to do is read the articles about doctors' financial ties to drug companies. For instance, here are just a few of the many articles I was able to dig up on this topic: Dr. Adriane Fugh-Berman's New England Journal of Medicine piece, "Doctors must not be lapdogs to drug firms" ; the Associated Press's "Groups Question Doctors' Ties to Drug Firms"; and my personal favorite, MSNBC's "Cancer docs profit from chemotherapy drugs."
While Moore castigates the pharmaceutical companies for charging huge amounts of money for their drugs, he doesn't at all address the fact that we can't even be sure these drugs are safe, since so many drug companies hire doctors and universities to conduct their so-called "trials," and then to write about how successful these "trials" are. Many have blown this whistle.
Is it possible that Moore didn't know about this highly questionable practice? (See the wonderful 2000 article by Marcia Angell, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, "Is Academic Medicine for Sale?" -- and Slate Magazine's shocking "Rent-a-Researcher: Did a British University Sell Out to Procter & Gamble?" In 2006, the Wall Street Journal's David Armstrong blew the whistle on the American Medical Association (his article is reprinted here) by exposing the fact that the association's own professional journal, JAMA, had published the findings of a study, for which the doctors/researchers involved had a total of nearly 60 financial ties to Big Pharma! (I commented on this situation on HonestMedicine.com.)
And what about our hospitals?
On both Larry King and David Letterman's shows, Michael Moore stated that our hospitals and doctors are among the best in the world. While his movie clearly shows that our healthcare ranks pretty low in several arenas, he cites lack of insurance coverage as the main reason.
But he does NOT point out that American healthcare can also be pretty dangerous. Take the article, "Is US Health Really the Best in the World?," written by Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, and published in the AMA's own JAMA (July 26, 2000). It clearly delineates how dangerous US Healthcare can be -- especially the hospitals and doctors. In addition to pointing out that the US ranks pretty low in lots of areas, including 13th (last) for low-birth-rate percentages, 10th for life expectancy at 40 for females, and 9th for males, Dr. Starfield writes about the horrible "combined effects of errors and adverse effects that occur because of iatrogenic [doctor-caused] damage not associated with recognizable error." This article is truly eye-opening. I wish Michael Moore had read it before he made SiCKO.
So, are our hospitals and doctors really the best?
My final point is more of a worry about our country than a criticism of SiCKO. I, too, want universal healthcare, and I too, believe that, in order for us to have it, we'll need a single payer system. But, is our government up to the task? During the 15 years after Tim's initial brain tumor diagnosis, and especially after 2002, when he became totally disabled, I have personally had to deal with many government employees in order to obtain services for him. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of government workers who were responsive, concerned, and seemed to know what they were doing. I won't go into the details here. But suffice it to say, I worry about the possibility of putting our healthcare in their hands.
And lastly, I worry that Moore's big concern -- that Americans have come to think in terms of "me" rather than "we" -- may prove to be the most serious problem of all. I don't think I will ever forget the reaction in SiCKO of Danny, the son of Donna and Larry Smith, the couple who ended up in their daughter's basement:
"What do we do about people like you guys? I mean, you're supposed to pay the deductible for $9000, which I understand. That's part of healthcare. But, what about the people like Cathy [his sister] and I that have to come up there and move you every 5 years, every 2 years, every year, because you don't have enough money to stay where you are?"
To which, Donna can only respond, "I'm sorry. It's not what we wanted to have happen. And we're doing what we can to make the change. You don't know what that feels like inside. At 50-some years old to have to reach out to my 20-something year-old for help."
Moore did not comment on this interchange.
But, if a son can treat his beaten-down parents this way, can we really expect Americans to be willing to do what it takes to help people they don't even know? I hope we can.
Make no mistake about it: Michael Moore's movie is an important -- even brilliant -- start. I was incredibly moved by it. And as you can see, it certainly got me thinking. I sincerely hope SiCKO signals the beginning of a really serious, productive discussion about healthcare, and that we can come up with a solution that helps ALL our citizens, and doesn't punish those of us who become sick.
I had a great-uncle who absolutely REFUSED to see any doctors pretty much until he got so sick with metastatic prostate cancer that he had to go to a nursing home.
I'm beginning to adopt that attitude the older that I get.
We do have some great doctors in this country and some great technology, but there's something fundamentally perverted about the attitudes that exist that allow people to be treated the way we do.
Moore's right about one thing though - nothing will ever change until we grow a pair sufficient to say we're not going to take it any more and I don't know if we will ever reach that point.
Posted by: Axinar | July 01, 2007 at 08:38 PM
Understand the problems. But, why proposing ONE solution, the government. The US government is incompetent in everything they do. As you've noted, politicians spend their time playing to special interests. So, why turn it over to them, to botch it even worse? Maybe more effort should go to consider other alternatives.
Posted by: Keith Pings | July 02, 2007 at 05:07 PM
Der Julia -
This is the best review I have read including all the top newspapers in the country! Thank you.
I am forwarding it on to my email list and I would encourage all your readers to do the same!
Posted by: Corinne Edwards | July 04, 2007 at 09:18 AM
Hello,
It sound like you have been through a desperate situation, I can't believe what you have put up with. Given that, would you consider a different viewpoint? When I walked into the movie, I didn't know much about universal health coverage, but I walked out wanting it, for me and for my country. Do you really want to have seen a different film? I think this one leaves people with "oh, now I get it!"
To Mr Pings above: do politicians "botch" the postal service? Do they "botch" your driver's license? How about Medicare? Yes, politicians do botch the health care system now, because when there are fortunes to be made, there are politicians to be bought. What are you worried about when the overhead on care goes from 31 cents of every health care dollar today to 1.5 cents of a universal system?
Posted by: freethoughtmom | July 05, 2007 at 08:25 AM
Hello,
It sound like you have been through a desperate situation, I can't believe what you have put up with. Given that, would you consider a different viewpoint? When I walked into the movie, I didn't know much about universal health coverage, but I walked out wanting it, for me and for my country. Do you really want to have seen a different film? I think this one leaves people with "oh, now I get it!"
To Mr Pings above: do politicians "botch" the postal service? Do they "botch" your driver's license? How about Medicare? Yes, politicians do botch the health care system now, because when there are fortunes to be made, there are politicians to be bought. What are you worried about when the overhead on care goes from 31 cents of every health care dollar today to 1.5 cents of a universal system?
Posted by: freethoughtmom | July 05, 2007 at 08:25 AM
A study by the Karolinska Institute in Sweden reported that the American health care system outperforms the European health care system in getting new medicines to cancer patients. According to the study, "the proportion of colorectal cancer patients with access to the drug Avastin was 10 times higher in the United States than it was in Europe."
In other words, if you are a colorectal cancer patient, you are far better off in the United States (if you are lucky enough to have health insurance) than in Europe. It says that our health care system is good at delivering expensive drugs, but what it also says is that our health care system is not so good at simple medicine like preventive care, compared to Europe. Our profit-based health care system is very good at creating new health care products that will make a lot of money, but if it's something that has no chance of profit, forget it.
Our health care system is very good at creating new drugs and technologies and marketing them to hospitals, physicians and patients. And where our health care system isn't profitable, it is a total failure. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the United States does a good job of developing and delivering new and expensive drugs to cancer patients, because that is the only thing we're good at. But it'll take a rocket scientist to figure out how this is a better health care system.
Posted by: gpawelski | July 14, 2007 at 11:56 AM
Julia,
I work with Michael Moore. Since his new film "SiCKO" opened, we've been noticing that people all over the country talking after the film spontaneously, and are organizing events; town halls, movie nights and so on, basically making this a movement, not a movie. We'd love to keep the momentum up by gathering stories of people who've organized SiCKO events of their own. Do you have any stories to share?
I am working on this tonight! Can you email me at [email protected]?
Posted by: Amy Cooke | July 20, 2007 at 11:09 PM
That exchange with the son was one of the most memorable parts of the film for me too. I think that Moore didn't have to comment on it - he left it in the film and counted on it resonating with people.
Commenting on it would have been cruel I think and something he may have done when he was the guy making Roger and Me but he's grown up now.
Posted by: eRobin | July 30, 2007 at 01:46 PM
Julia,
Wonderful review. My major gripe with SICKO is that it did not even mention the vital nature of "alternative" health care to the U.S. population. Visits to alternative medical practitioners became more numerous than those to allopathic physicians in 1994 and have continued to increase -- mostly not paid by insurance but by the individual. Large numbers of people are seeking out their own information on health care using the web sites, books, blogs like yours, podcasts, etc. Education like this about self-treatment may be our best hope. Your husband could probably have recovered if you had avoided the allopathic medical system -- as my former wife could have. I don't think either of us would take the same approach we did in the 90's if something like that happened to a family member again. This is a general trend. I see it every day. People are taking charge of their health care and getting smarter than the doctors about prevention.
Bless you. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: Bill_Henderson | August 05, 2007 at 09:36 PM
excellent review julia. the best part about moore's sicko is you dont come to know about alternate therapies. offlate it is ben creating bit of ripples
Posted by: fitline | August 07, 2007 at 05:29 AM
Thanks for the review. Sorry to hear about the loss of your husband.
I disagree with you on Univ. hlth care. We should allow natural health modalities in this country. That said, the diagnostics in this country is great. The fix is a disgrace. The body doesn't heal with synthetics such as drugs. The body heals itself if given the right resources. Of course, that would upset those that are in bed together - Congress, big pharma, big mfg.
Apparently Michael didn't read the stats. One third of all deaths in this country is from - you guessed it - drugs. And Univ hlth care would only add to this number.
Posted by: Dan Oelkers | August 13, 2007 at 03:55 PM
To Dan: Well said. I believe what you say is the real issue in the health care industry. It is not natural, it is not good for the body and it does not cure illness. That being said however, the real killer that we are talking about is not even physical. It is emotional. It is fear. It is sadness. It is feelings of abandonment. It is suddenly being worthless after a life of work as worth. That was what struck me while I watched the movie Sicko. I was really struck by the fact that instead of charging money to their ill citizens they would pay them money. I was struck by their caring for every individual. I don’t know how real all that is but it sure would be nice to live with a government that does that.
Posted by: Janelizabeth | September 30, 2007 at 01:07 PM
Dan,
Nice post!
Michael Moore's SiCKO clearly demonstrates our badly our nation's Healthcare System is failing (cherry picking or not).
It's extremely important that voters know the facts on where each candidate stands on Healthcare.
RxPop.com features a very nice collection of videos featuring politicians speaking out on the Healthcare Crisis in the United States.
The videos are located at:
http://www.rxpop.com/politics.asp
Enjoy!
Posted by: William Hill | December 23, 2007 at 06:23 PM
One way the consumers can fight back is by getting pricing information by using the internet to do price comparison searches.
Posted by: Lipator | April 16, 2008 at 04:25 PM
WHITE WOMEN HAVE OBAMA TO THANK FOR WHITE MEN RESPECT
Had it not been for the fact of Senator Obama running for President. There would have never been a white female Vice President. 43 white only male only Presidents and NEVER in the history of the country did a white Republican respect a white female for President or Vice President. Just think about it America, all you had to do to get white presidents to respect a white female was to support a black American for President! Senator Obama is the only reason for Gov. Palin. Blacks are accuse of only voting for Senator Obama because he is black. This is so un-true and surly not base on black voting history. Black voted for Bill Clinton 89% and Jimmy Carter 87%. Blacks not whites fought and died to vote for white men. In 1920 the passing of the 19 Amendment gave white women the right to vote for white men. McCain's pick is affirmative action 101. A token female is a understatement.!!! But Obama is to thank for the first time in history a white women is finally respected by white male president candidate republican. Gov. Palin has no overseas experince.! She only been in elected office for 6 years. Four years as Mayor of about 9,000 and 2 years as Governor of Alaska population 700,000. She is a mother of five and under investigation for abuse of office! Another thing that the white pundits will not say. Never in the history of the country did a white male repubican candidate feel the need to respect a white woman for vice president! WHITE WOMEN....ALL TOGETHER..'''SAY''' THANK YOU OBAMA!
Posted by: Tyrone | September 18, 2008 at 08:09 AM
Since when is Obama "black"?
Since when is Obama "white"?
He is neither.
He is BI-RACIAL.
Someone who calls Obama "black" is, in effect, following in the footsteps of slaveowners who considered someone a negro if they had a "drop" of negroid blood in them. Surely we've left that prejudiced notion in the historical dustbin where it belongs. Let's call Mr. Obama what he really is: BI-RACIAL.
Posted by: Paul Deming | September 24, 2008 at 11:58 PM
When there is a serious illness, many, many doctors are involved, most of whom neither Tim nor I had never seen or heard of, even though I was in his room almost all the time.
Posted by: Medical Negligence Solicitor | October 26, 2010 at 07:43 AM
I hope you all have a blessed day
Posted by: air jordans | November 09, 2010 at 01:41 AM
Damn, I hate to say it , and I dont drink Bud. But, I liked it. Alot. I hate to say it. I am a classic trained Chef In San Francisco, and own three very well known establishments. I have trained under some of the best. I dont know what happened to me but this stuff was tasty, in a trashy, sorta.. tangy.. by the trailer kinda way. It could be paired with some yummy treats.
Posted by: coach outlet | December 07, 2010 at 07:17 AM
I also watched the movie. Movie was awesome. Loved it.
Posted by: medical negligence solicitor | March 18, 2011 at 04:45 AM
Medical Claims will help us to meet the target of health issues which create problems on the earlier stage before getting claims from health service provider.
Posted by: Medical Malpractice | June 10, 2011 at 02:34 AM
What should I do if a lawyer I don't know approaches me?
Posted by: injury compensation ireland | July 05, 2011 at 06:08 AM
I ask some strangers what they think, and average their thoughts. But, as long as it looks good to YOU, go for it, I say.
Posted by: Barefoot Sports Shoes | July 07, 2011 at 04:30 AM
http://www.tapso.co.uk
Posted by: cherry | July 27, 2011 at 04:24 AM
Swich to wordpress, make your blogger nicer. -My 2 cents
Posted by: best remote control helicopter | December 07, 2011 at 11:16 AM